
Employee exits can quickly turn into a risk management issue, not just an HR process. When someone leaves, especially from a strategic or client-facing role, companies face immediate concerns: exposure of confidential information, potential client poaching, and employees moving straight to competitors.
At the same time, cutting access too abruptly or ending employment on the spot isn’t always practical or legally straightforward.
This is where garden leaves become relevant. It allows companies to keep employees on payroll during their notice period while removing them from day-to-day responsibilities, helping reduce risk without disrupting the transition.
Garden leave is a period where an employee remains on the payroll during their notice period but is not required to perform their normal duties.
During this time, the employee may be asked to:
The term originally became common in the UK and Commonwealth employment practices, but many companies globally now use similar arrangements.
Yes, garden leave can generally be used in Southeast Asia, but the rules and enforceability differ from country to country.
In many Southeast Asian markets, garden leave is not always specifically regulated under employment law. Instead, its validity usually depends on:
For example, in countries like Singapore and Malaysia, garden leave arrangements are more commonly recognized when they are clearly stated in the employment agreement and do not unfairly restrict the employee.
Meanwhile, in markets like Indonesia, Vietnam, and Philippines, enforceability can become more nuanced depending on local labor protections, termination rules, and how restrictive the arrangement is.
Companies should also remember that post-employment restrictions and non-compete clauses are treated differently across Southeast Asia. A clause that works in one country may not automatically be enforceable in another.
Garden leave isn’t necessary for every resignation. It’s typically used in situations where the risk to the business is higher than usual.
If an employee has knowledge of trade secrets, financial data, or strategic plans, allowing them to continue working during the notice period could pose a risk, especially if they’re joining a competitor.
Garden leave creates a buffer period that delays the employee’s transition to a competing company. This helps protect client relationships, internal processes, and competitive advantage.
For roles like sales, account management, or partnerships, employees often have strong relationships with clients. Garden leave minimizes the chance of client poaching or influence during the transition period.
Senior leaders often have access to high-level decision-making and company direction. Placing them on garden leave can prevent disruption while the company manages internal communications and succession planning.
If an employee is likely to become disengaged, disruptive, or uncooperative during their notice period, garden leave can help maintain team stability and morale.
Garden leave is not always suitable for every role or market. Some challenges include:
Employees remain on payroll even if they are no longer actively contributing to the business. Long notice periods can become expensive, especially for senior employees.
Some countries have stricter rules around employee restrictions during notice periods. What works in one market may not automatically apply elsewhere.
If handled poorly, garden leave can create negative employee experiences and damage employer branding. Clear communication and professionalism matter throughout the process.
For companies scaling internationally, managing employee exits consistently across different markets becomes more complex over time.
Notice periods, termination requirements, payroll obligations, and restrictive covenant rules can vary widely between countries.
This is where many companies look for support from local HR and compliance experts or use solutions like an Employer of Record (EOR) to help manage compliant employment practices across regions.
A structured approach helps companies reduce legal risks while maintaining smoother employee transitions globally.
Garden leave is a strategic tool, not just an HR formality. When used correctly, it helps companies protect their business interests during employee transitions without creating unnecessary conflict.
However, it should be applied selectively. Not every role requires it, and overusing garden leave can lead to unnecessary costs.
The key is balance: use garden leave where the risk justifies the cost, and rely on clear policies to guide your decision.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive all our latest news and offers delivered right to your desk.